Groups Feed

What stood out most for me was the emphasis on integration over intention. The documents reinforced that workplace well-being only becomes sustainable when it is embedded into existing

systems (governance, planning cycles, leadership expectations, and measurement) rather than positioned as a standalone initiative. The focus on clear roles, shared accountability, and

disciplined planning clarified how easily good strategies can stall when ownership, escalation pathways, or success indicators are vague.

I was particularly struck by the practical framing of accountability: one owner per action, defined contributors, and visible reporting. This challenged me to be more deliberate about resisting

“committee ownership” and instead designing structures that support follow-through, learning, and course correction. The SMARTER approach to outcomes also reinforced the importance of

building evaluation and re-adjustment into the plan from the start, rather than treating measurement as a post-implementation activity.

Workplace evaluation and assessment are critical to ensuring initiatives are effective, relevant, and aligned with organisational needs. Right now, as I’m newer to my organisation and it didn’t have a structured health and wellness program, I find it essential to continually evaluate and assess engagement, buy-in, and practical use as the initiative develops. Ongoing assessment helps identify employee needs, measure participation, and determine whether strategies are resonating across different levels of the organisation. It also allows for timely adjustments, ensuring the committee evolves in a way that is sustainable and meaningful rather than symbolic. I will be using a number of the resources provided as we develop the programming further.

Hi everyone! My name is Jihan Rabah (she/her), and I’m based in Ottawa, Ontario. I work as a Research and Strategy Advisor at Public Safety Canada, where I support community‑based initiatives that build resilience, promote wellbeing, prevent violence and strengthen public safety outcomes. My academic background spans special education, public administration, psychology, and equity‑informed digital education, and my professional experience brings together international NGO work, academic research, and federal policy. Across all of these roles, my work consistently sits at the intersection of health, inclusion, and performance, with a strong emphasis on psychological safety, evidence‑informed decision‑making, and fostering workplace cultures where people feel supported to do their best work.

As a communicator, I definitely found the engagement and survey sections interesting and important! These must be done thoughtfully and carefully or you risk losing data, buy-in, attention, etc. The piece on hierarchy and org structure really points out that having a solid understanding of the org and its key players are going to be the big determinants influencing challenges and possibilities of change. I feel like more often, you're going to have to work within the system instead of trying to overhaul it. Is that too pessimistic or is it realistic? I'm not sure 🙃

This module was a great reminder of how all of these elements can contribute to (or hinder) the ecology of a workplace and the importance of consistent evaluation and assessment. Working with people means that every team, every moment and every interaction can be different and there are clear and consistent places where we can spend our time and resources to create opportunities for success and connection. We talk a lot at my workplace about how we are human-centered and our impulse (thankfully) is to support our team, but I'm now thinking about ways that our intent hasn't been as clearly defined as it could be and where we get tripped up in delivery. I'm looking forward to thinking about each of our crews individually rather than at our organization as a whole!